Bell Towers, Steeples, and Spires Part One

February 5th, 2010

A very good friend of mine asked recently about the origin of steeples on church buildings. It was an innocent and inquiring question that arose because he had heard a speaker make some rather daring and unchallenged claims about the origins of both church buildings and steeples. Now the question was something along the lines of “since the Bible does not require steeples on church buildings, why do so many church buildings have them?”

We should note from the beginning that the word we translate “church” from the Greek New Testament has a fundamental or basic meaning of “assembly.” Thus we should understand that the church consists of people and not of architecture. However, an assembly presupposes a place to assemble. And that place of assembly must be an agreed-upon place. Otherwise if we had 250 people assembling in 250 different places, well…there would not be an assembly!

There is an assumption by many people, especially those in the “home church” movement, that the first century churches did not meet in buildings but in homes. They get this from the fact that the Scripture refers to those early churches as “houses.” Ah, but this is why you need a Rabbi. The word “house” was attached at that time to the idea of a synagogue. Thus a synagogue may be known as a “beth tefillah” (house of prayer), a “beth knesset” (house of assembly), a ‘”beth din” (house of judgment), etc. You get the idea.

In the book of Acts this same idea is transferred over into Greek. Thus the idea of the temple, as the “beth tefillah” in 1 Kings 8:29, 38, etc. is mentioned by Christ in the Greek NT as “oikos proseukes” or “house of prayer.” The Greek means precisely the same thing as the Hebrew, as the English. But should that designation be placed upon synagogues as well as the first or second temple? Yes, based on the understanding we have from Leviticus 23:3.

In the Leviticus passage we see that from weekly Sabbath to weekly Sabbath there should be a holy convocation (miqra) in every “dwelling” (moshabh). The word that the KJV translates as dwelling is a place for assembling. This is the original idea of the synagogue. The fact that synagogues continued to exist throughout the Old Testament period is attested by 2 Kings 4:23. When the woman began to ride to see the man of God, her husband pointed out that it was neither new moon nor Sabbath. This indicates that it was customary to go hear the man of God on those days. But if the people assembled to hear the man of God on the Sabbath day and if they did it in accordance with the holy convocation mentioned in Leviticus 23:3, then they must have done it at a synagogue (place for gathering together).

When we come to the New Testament book of Acts this will help us to understand what is meant by the people of God eating their bread at various “houses.” This was not simply a visitation program or progressive dinner. Rather it was the celebration of the Lord’s Supper in the several Christian synagogues. We must remember that the Christians did not become a group altogether distinct from other Jewish people until much later. They broke bread “kat’ oikon” or per each house (Acts 2:46). This is a rather wooden translation in the English, but it does not necessarily mean “at home” as both ESV and NIV indicate. Such a translation would simply indicate that they went to the temple to worship and then went home to eat. A rather mundane idea and almost certainly a wrong translation.

But if we understand the preposition “kata” to have a distributive sense here, as the KJV does, then the idea would be that they were breaking bread together in each house just as they were praying and worshiping in the temple. But what would we understand “house” to mean in this context if we had not been conditioned by our culture? We would understand the “house” to be a house of assembly (beth knesset) or a house of prayer (beth tefillah) or even a house of judgment (beth din) as 1 Peter 4:17.

Notice also in the book of Acts where Paul was hauling men and women into prison and causing them to be convicted as blasphemers of the name. Acts 8:3 states plainly that Paul entered into every house in order to make havoc of the church. However, later on when explaining what he had been doing, Paul just as plainly stated that he was actually entering into the synagogues in order to take these men and women prisoner and have them beaten (Acts 22:19; 26:11). From this comparison of the two accounts of the same acts, we can justly conclude that the term “synagogue” and the term “house” were equivalent in Paul and Luke’s minds – Luke being the author of the Acts of the Apostles.

This is not to say that a church must meet in a church building in order to be a church. As stated clearly above, the term “church” refers to the assembly itself. The synagogue or house refers simply to the place where that assemblage takes place. But while it does not require that the church own a building, there is surely a presumption that the church has every right to own a building as far as Scripture precedent is concerned. Granted, we have said nothing thus far about steeples or spires, but we shall save that for a second entry: Bell Towers, Steeples, and Spires Part Two.

Order of Worship For August 2, 2009

August 1st, 2009

Call to Worship                                                                      Psalm 93:5
Thy testimonies are very sure: holiness becometh thine house, O LORD, for ever.

* Invocation
* Psalm 91:1-18                                                              “He That Doth”
(Page 201 Comprehensive Psalter)
Scripture Reading                                                           Psalms 120-128
* Prayer And Lord’s Prayer
Scripture Reading                                                                    Judges 14
* Psalm 91:9-16                                                       “Because The Lord”
(Page 202 Comprehensive Psalter)
* Prayer For Sermon
Sermon                                                                    Basic Truths Part 30
                                                         “Present At The Table of The Lord”
                                                                                        Hebrews 10:14
Lord’s Supper
* Psalm 93                                                            “The Lord Doth Reign”
(Page 205 Comprehensive Psalter)
* Benediction

Order of Worship for July 19th, 2009

July 15th, 2009

Call to Worship Psalm 86:9
All nations whom thou hast made shall come and worship before thee, O Lord; and shall glorify thy name.
* Invocation
* Psalm 85 “O Lord”
(Page 183)
Scripture Reading Psalm 119:97-144
* Prayer And Lord’s Prayer
Scripture Reading Judges 12
* Psalm 88:1-9 “Lord God”
(Page 187)
* Prayer For Sermon
Sermon Basic Truths Part 29
“The Spirituality of the Lord’s Supper”
1 Corinthians 10:15-16
Lord’s Supper
* Psalm 88:10-19 “Wilt Thou Shew Wonders To The Dead?”
(Page 188)
* Benediction
* Indicates Congregation Standing

One More Reason To Avoid Public Schools

July 1st, 2009

The public schools, by requiring such a huge number of vaccinations, are requiring American children to be exposed to many times what the EPA says is a “safe level” of thimerosal. The dosage for a single vaccination may be low enough, but the mercury in thimerosal, like all organomercurial compounds, has a cumulative effect.

Someone may argue that what Kennedy is saying is nothing more than a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. But that ignores the fact that scientific method is a post hoc approach.

Here is more information from a website on childhood autism: http://www.nationalautismassociation.org/thimerosal.php

Film at JPFO Website

June 26th, 2009

New Things confuse me. At least until they’re not new anymore. So I don’t understand about how links are added to FaceBook. Btw, if anyone who receives this email is not stalking me on FB, you can also get most of my updates on http://www.fpcr.org/FaithPressBlog (see below in my sig). Hopefully, a link will eventually appear today in both FB and Faith Press Blog.

First a "plug" for the organization Jews For The Preservation of Firearms Ownership. This is one of my favorite organizations. JPFO represents a constituency that definitely does or should know about gun control. The holocaust would not have been possible had the Jews of Europe been armed as well as the Nazi jackboots in 1932. Anyway, their newest film is another knockout punch. The film, No Guns For Negroes, exposes the racist history of American gun control laws. Just as abortion is inherently racist against black Americans and has been ever since the Darwinist-eugenicist Margaret Sanger first founded Planned Parenthood, so also are gun control laws inherently racist and smack of the old "Jim Crow" laws of the post-reconstruction south.

Here is the link. You can download or watch this free film online or you can get a DVD by joining JPFO.

Black Genocide: Alive and Still Unwell!

June 24th, 2009

Order of Worship For June 21, 2009

June 15th, 2009

Sabbath Afternoon: June 21, 2009
_______
Afternoon Worship
2:00 p.m.

Call to Worship                                                                    Psalm 77:14
Thou art the God that doest wonders:
thou hast declared thy strength among the people.

* Invocation
* Psalm 74:12-17                                                             “For Certainly”
Scripture Reading                                                           Psalms 111-115
* Prayer And Lord’s Prayer
Scripture Reading                                                                      Judges 8
* Psalm 77:1-9                                                               “Unto The Lord”
* Prayer For Sermon
Sermon                                                                    Basic Truths Part 25
                                                                              “The Means of Grace”
                                                                                    Romans 10:14-17
Lord’s Supper
* Psalm 77:10-16                                                          “Then Did I Say”
* Benediction
* Indicates Congregation Standing

Christian Observer Quotes Obama Quoting Qur’an

June 10th, 2009

Foes of the global jihad are constantly accused of quoting the Qur’an "out of context," but when Barack Obama actually did so in Cairo yesterday, [i.e. June 4th – REB] no one seems to have minded.

He quoted one Qur’an verse in connection with speaking of our shared interests as human beings:

As the Holy Koran tells us, "Be conscious of God and speak always the truth." That is what I will try to do – to speak the truth as best I can, humbled by the task before us, and firm in my belief that the interests we share as human beings are far more powerful than the forces that drive us apart.

Ironically, the Qur’anic passage from which his quote comes actually is about fighting unbelievers, and doesn’t remotely lead to thoughts of coming together with people with whom one has differences.

Obama quoted 9:119, which Pickthall renders this way: "O ye who believe! Be careful of your duty to Allah, and be with the truthful."

The passage continues:

It is not for the townsfolk of Al-Madinah and for those around them of the wandering Arabs to stay behind the messenger of Allah and prefer their lives to his life. That is because neither thirst nor toil nor hunger afflicteth them in the way of Allah, nor step they any step that angereth the disbelievers, nor gain they from the enemy a gain, but a good deed is recorded for them therefor. Lo! Allah loseth not the wages of the good. Nor spend they any spending, small or great, nor do they cross a valley, but it is recorded for them, that Allah may repay them the best of what they used to do. And the believers should not all go out to fight. Of every troop of them, a party only should go forth, that they (who are left behind) may gain sound knowledge in religion, and that they may warn their folk when they return to them, so that they may beware. O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty (unto Him). — 9:120-123

In that passage, the Qur’an is scolding Muslims who refused to accompany Muhammad on his expedition to Tabouk in northern Arabia, where he wanted to fight a Byzantine garrison. The Byzantines weren’t there when he arrived, and so there was no battle, but he was considerably angered that some Muslims in Medina and among the Bedouins ("wandering Arabs") had refused to make the trip — they "prefer[red] their lives to his life." The Qur’an promises that if they do anything that "angereth the disbelievers," they will be credited with having done a good deed, and Allah will repay them for such good deeds. The Muslims should fight the unbelievers and be harsh with them.

Obama picked out of this one sentence that made it appear as if the Qur’an was simply counseling one to speak the truth, mindful of the divine presence. In reality, the passage is about the necessity to wage jihad warfare against unbelievers, and not to fail to perform this duty. He took a passage about warfare and division and passed it off as part of a call for us all to come together and sing kumbaya.

Yet neither Honest Ibe Hooper of CAIR nor any other Muslim spokesman is complaining today that Obama quoted the Qur’an out of context. How strange!

Order of Worship for June 14, 2009

June 8th, 2009

Sabbath Afternoon: June 14, 2009
_______
Afternoon Worship
2:00 p.m.

Call to Worship                                                                    Psalm 72:18
Blessed be the LORD God, the God of Israel, who only doeth wondrous things.

* Invocation
* Psalm 72:1-10                                               “O Lord, Thy Judgments”
Scripture Reading                                                           Psalms 108-110
* Prayer And Lord’s Prayer
Scripture Reading                                                                      Judges 7
* Psalm 72:11-19                                          “Yea, All The Mighty Kings”
* Prayer For Sermon
Sermon                                                                    Basic Truths Part 24
                                                               “Faith and Good Works Part 2”
                                                                                          Hebrews 11:1
Lord’s Supper
* Psalm 74:1-11                                            “Oh, God, Why Hast Thou”
* Benediction

* Indicates Congregation Standing

Calvinism On The Rise In China

June 6th, 2009

The following is edited from Andrew Brown

John Calvin was a Frenchman, but he is being remembered in Geneva this week because it was here that he built Calvinism. Invited to reform the city in 1541, almost as what would now be called a management consultant, he formed an alliance with the city fathers. Over the next 20 years of preaching and pastoring they turned this tiny city, with a population then of only 10,000, into a model of church government and theology which has changed the world.

His followers now form the third-largest Christian grouping in the world. The world alliance of reformed churches claims 75 million members, and while this is a lower headline figure than the Anglican Communion’s 80 million, it is not inflated by 25 million nominal Anglicans in Britain.

Although Calvinism is shrinking in western Europe and North America, it is experiencing an extraordinary success in China. I spent some time on Monday talking to Dr. May Tan, from Singapore, where the overseas Chinese community has close links with mainland China. The story she told of the spread of Calvinist religion as an elite religion in China was quite extraordinary. There may be some parallels with the growth of Calvinism in South Korea, where the biggest Presbyterian churches in the world are to be found, but it’s absolutely unlike the pattern in Africa and Latin America. There, the fastest growing forms of Christianity are Pentecostal, and they are spreading among the poor.

But in China neither of those things are to be true.

Calvinists despise Pentecostals. They shudder at unbridled emotion. If they are slain in the spirit, it is with a single, decorous thump: there’s to be no rolling afterwards. And in China, the place where Calvinism is spreading fastest is the elite universities, fuelled by prodigies of learning and translation. Wang Xiaochao, a philosopher at one of the Beijing universities, has translated the two major works of St Augustine, the Confessions and the City of God, into Chinese directly from Latin. Gradually all the major works of the first centuries of the Christian tradition are being translated directly from the original languages into Chinese.

All of this is happening outside the control of the official body which is supposed to monitor and supervise the churches in China. Instead, it is the philosophy departments at the universities, or the language departments and the departments of literature and western civilization that are the channel.

“The [officially recognized] churches are not happy with universities, because it is not within their control. And their seminaries are not at the intellectual level of the universities,” says Dr Tan. “Chinese Christianity using Chinese to do Christian thinking has become a very interesting movement.”

Many of the missionaries who tried to bring Christianity to China before the communists took over were Presbyterians, and other sorts of Calvinist. But that does not explain why Calvinism should be the preferred theology of the house churches and the intellectuals now. Dr Tan suggests that this is because it is Protestant: that is to say it can be made much more convincingly native than Roman Catholicism, since Presbyterian congregations choose their own pastors. This is, I suspect, enormously important at a time when China is recovering from a century and a half of being the victim of western powers; the pope’s insistence on appointing Catholic bishops is unacceptable to the government and perhaps to the people too.

If she goes to an official church, she says, “There will be perhaps 1000 people and 95% of them are over 65. So it’s a sunset church. But if I went to house church – there would be 1000 people; perhaps 20 of them in their 50s, and all the rest are youngsters. The older ones will all be professors at the universities. So these are the future of the churches. They have no registered pastors, and no access to seminaries: But they have youth, and future, and money.”

Calvinism isn’t a religion of subservience to any government. The great national myths of Calvinist cultures are all of wars against imperialist oppressors: the Dutch against the Spanish, the Scots against the English; the Americans against the British. So when the Chinese house churches first emerged from the rubble of the Cultural Revolution in the 80s and 90s “They began to search what theology will support and inform [them]. They read Luther and said, ‘not him’. So they read Calvin, and they said ‘him, because he has a theology of resistance.’ Luther can’t teach them or inform them how to deal with a government that is opposition.”

And, though the communists stigmatized Christianity as a foreign religion, they also and still more thoroughly smashed up the traditional religions of China: “The communist, socialist critique of traditional religion, and of Confucianism has been effective”, she says: “The youngsters think it is very cool to be Christian. Communism has removed all the obstacles for them to come to Christianity.”

The most conservative estimates of the new converts to Christianity is 500,000; there is a new church built every month. Calvinist Christianity has a culture of phenomenal industry. Calvin himself, in his time in Geneva, preached every day and twice on Sundays: shorthand writers at the foot of his pulpit took down 108 volumes of his sermons, though most of these have been lost and his reputation rests on the books and pamphlets that he wrote himself. In China now, this kind of Christianity is seen as forward-looking, rational, intellectually serious, and favorable to making money.

“Very soon”, said Dr Tan, “Christians will become the majority of university students … that could happen.”

It would be astonishing if China were to become a great power in the Christian world, as well as in the economic one. But things just as strange have happened in the past. Who could have foreseen, when Augustine was writing those huge books now translated into Chinese, that barbarous Europe would become the center of Christian civilization, and his homeland in North Africa would become entirely Muslim?